Contact: Judy Putnam at (517) 487-5436
Sept. 28, 2011
New policy puts seniors, kids, tax dollars at risk
A coalition of policy groups today called for Gov. Rick Snyder to reverse a new $5,000 limit on assets for the Food Assistance Program. The asset test is set to take effect Saturday.
The groups sent a letter, signed by 115 organizations – including emergency food providers, statewide policy groups and others – protesting the asset test that puts seniors, kids, families and state tax dollars at risk. The $5,000 includes cash, some savings, and the total value of vehicles with the first $15,000 exempted.
“We all agree that poverty is a bad thing. We all agree that hunger is a bad thing. We all agree that we need to be good stewards of our precious dollars,’’ said Gilda Z. Jacobs, president & CEO of the Michigan League for Human Services. “On Saturday, the Snyder administration will implement a policy that runs counter to all of that.”
The groups pointed out that because food assistance is federally funded, no state tax dollars will be saved. In the past high error rates have cost the state $65 million in penalties. Studies show that most errors are caused by overburdened caseworkers.
The new test is also bucking the trend where most other states eliminated asset tests in order to help the newly unemployed and others get through tough economic times. In fact 29 other states have no asset tests and 48 states and the District of Columbia exempt at least one vehicle from asset tests.
The new policy also comes as census data show that one in every four children in Michigan – 23.5 percent – is living in poverty. That’s an income of about $17,000 or less a year for a family of three.
“With the number of children living in poverty in Michigan rising every day, putting more roadblocks in the way of families that need help now makes absolutely no sense,’’ said Jack Kresnak, president and CEO of Michigan’s Children. “Practically no state revenues are spent on food stamps and this new eligibility requirement only exacerbates an already difficult situation for Michigan’s impoverished children who don’t have access to nutritious food.”
Last month, food assistance helped 810,000 children in Michigan, including 278,000 children ages 0-5.
The program is also important for seniors living on fixed incomes. Between 2001 and 2009, the percentage and number of people age 50 and above struggling with hunger increased by nearly 80 percent, nationally.
In Michigan, nearly one third of all people 50 years of age and older – 301,500 residents – have already turned to the state Food Assistance Program for help.
“We know that is a low-ball figure compared to the number of older adults who could benefit by such assistance, but who don’t even yet know about it,’’ said Andy Farmer, associate state director of the AARP Michigan. “So this is no time for our state leaders to be placing additional barriers to ending hunger among Michigan’s elderly. They can’t take it, they shouldn’t be made to and driving more of our older citizens toward starvation is no way to assure stable communities, attract business or create jobs.”
The new asset test will also discourage families from saving.
“Safety net policies like the Food Assistance Program should help families overcome temporary difficult economic times — asset tests do the opposite,” said Ross H. Yednock, director of the Asset Building Policy Project at the Community Economic Development Association of Michigan.
“Instead of creating opportunities to save and achieve lasting financial security, asset limit tests force families to forfeit their long-term savings and economic self-sufficiency in order to receive short-term, yet vital, assistance. It is public policy that is as short-sighted as it is economically unsound.”
Peggy Vaughn-Payne, of the NorthWest Initiative in Lansing, a neighborhood organization, said it will be hard for groups serving families and communities to make up the difference.
“Even under the current rules, the families we serve and the children who rely on food assistance programs still struggle to receive healthy meals and nourishment,” Vaughn-Payne said. “These changes in asset limits will put more of our families on the brink of food insecurity and make it harder for organizations like ours to meet the growing need in our community.”